Samsung UE46F6100

Samsung UE46F6100
83

A Highly Rated LED TV

We compared the reviews, price and technical features of the Samsung UE46F6100 to over 210 other mid-size TVs that have been around for more than a year and overall it scored 82 out of 100. A score of 82 puts it near the bottom of all one year old mid-size TVs that we checked.

The Samsung UE46F6100 is one of the most expensive mid-size TVs. Because it is over one year old it might not have as many features as newer LED TVs.

£108.64
Running Cost Over 5 Years
46"
Display Diagonal
Full HD
HD Type
A+
Energy Efficiency Class
1
Year Old
£646.99
£670.00
£779.99
Get Free Price Alerts  Price Alert On

Email me FREE price alerts for the Samsung UE46F6100

Your email is always kept private.

You must provide an email address

Email me FREE price alerts for the Samsung UE46F6100

£

Please enter a price.

Email me FREE price alerts for the Samsung UE46F6100

Please provide a firstname

Change price alert    Cancel price alert  
We will send you price updates and vouchers for this product by email. We will email you vouchers and price alerts for this product when the price drops below £646.99. Please check your inbox and spam folder and click the link in the confirmation email that we have sent to you in order to start receiving price alerts.
5 Reasons For
Is 3D CapableEdit
The UE46F6100 is 3D capable. 3D compatible TVs allow you to watch 3D content. For most TVs you will need to wear special glasses to see the 3D effect.

We think you might also be interested in other 3D capable LED TVs including the UE32F6890, or the HG39EB675 from Samsung or the Sony KDL-42W807 which are cheaper; or the UE46F6800, the UN46EH6030, or the UE46F6510 all from Samsung which have a better Kagoo Rating™. You can compare more 3D capable LED TVs by clicking on the Alternatives tab at the top of the page.
0
1535
Are 3D Capable LED TVs
0
2825
Are Not 3D Capable LED TVs
Number of LED TVs which are 3D capable
Samsung LED TVs Have Good Reviews
Based on 6465 expert and user reviews, Samsung has good ratings for its LED TVs. Samsung also only has good ratings for its mid-size TVs compared to other manufacturers.
91.5
89.5
87.9
87.5
LG
86.6
85.7
83.2
82.3
80.9
77.5
84
User Reviews Are Good
On average, UE46F6100 owners rated this LED TV 84 out of 100. Read user reviews.
Excellent (68%)
Good (10%)
Average (7%)
Poor (7%)
Terrible (7%)
Big Display DiagonalEdit
Mid-size TVs that are one year old have a display diagonal between 31.5" and 48". With a display diagonal of 46", the UE46F6100 has a quite big display diagonal compared to most of the other other mid-size TVs that are a similar age.

TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies.

We compared all the other 46" LED TVs to this LED TV and we think the Samsung UE46F6200 which is cheaper; or the UE46F6500, the UE46F5500, and the UE46F6670 all from Samsung which have a better Kagoo Rating™ are also worth considering.

If this Samsung LED TV display diagonal is not big enough for you then you might want to consider the LG 47LA740V (47") which is also cheaper. You can compare other alternatives to this Samsung LED TV based on display diagonal.
No. of LED TVs
0
500
1000
46"
7"
16"
23"
30"
37"
44"
50"
57"
64"
71"
98"
Display Diagonal (")
Full HDEdit
The UE46F6100 is Full HD, which is typical of many mid-size TVs that have been released more than a year ago and that are currently on the market. Full HD TVs have a resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels.

The better the HD type the better the image resolution and the perceived sharpness of the image will be. This will be more noticeable on a TV with a larger display diagonal.

It is worth also looking at other Full HD LED TVs including the 47LN570V, or the 42LA641V from LG or the Samsung UE46F7000 which have a better Kagoo Rating™; or the 42LN613V, or the 42LN549 from LG or the Samsung HG39EB675 which are cheaper. You can compare more LED TVs HD type alternatives on the Alternatives tab at the top of the page.
No. of LED TVs
0
1500
3000
 
HD-Ready
Full HD
4K Ultra HD
8K Ultra HD
Worst
Best
HD Type
4 Reasons Against
Only Two HDMI PortsEdit
The UE46F6100 is a two HDMI port LED TV. A greater number of HDMI ports will allow you to permanently connect more devices to the TV and will reduce the need to reach around the back of the TV to unplug and plug in cables when switching between devices.
No. of LED TVs
0
650
1300
2
1 2 3 4 5 6
Worst
Best
No. of HDMI Ports
High Annual Energy ConsumptionEdit
Mid-size TVs that are older than a year have an annual energy consumption between 0.22kWh and 210.2kWh. The UE46F6100 has one of the higher annual energy consumption (91kWh) of mid-size TVs of this age.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.
No. of LED TVs
0
295
590
91
kWh
0.22kWh
22kWh
45kWh
67kWh
89kWh
110kWh
130kWh
160kWh
180kWh
200kWh
660kWh
Best
Worst
Annual Energy Consumption (kWh)
Slow High Frequency RateEdit
The high frequency rates of other mid-size TVs of this age range from 50Hz to 1600Hz. With a high frequency rate of 200Hz, the UE46F6100 has one of the slower high frequency rates of all the one year old mid-size TVs.

The high frequency rate is also known as the refresh rate and it affects how smooth motion on the screen appears. Action will appear smoother on TVs with a higher frequency rate.
No. of LED TVs
0
550
1100
200
Hz
50Hz
150Hz
250Hz
350Hz
450Hz
540Hz
640Hz
740Hz
840Hz
940Hz
3000Hz
Best
Worst
High Frequency Rate (Hz)
One of the Most Expensive Mid-size TVs
At £646.99 this LED TV represents good value for a mid-size TV that is one year old. The price range of mid-size TVs that have been around for more than a year is from £144 to £3,444.
2 Other Reasons to Consider the Samsung UE46F6100
17 Months Old
Samsung released the UE46F6100 17 months ago.
Average Running CostsEdit
Energy efficiency classificationthe UE46F6100 has an average running cost of £111 over 5 years based on average usage levels and energy prices, which is typical compared to the other 177 mid-size TVs that are one year old that we have analysed.
Calculate your own running costs for the Samsung UE46F6100.
No. of LED TVs
0
500
1000
 
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
A+
A++
A+++
Worst
Best
Energy Efficiency Class
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Similar LED TVs Worth Considering

Lower Running Costs & Better Score
LG 42LA740V
90
£549.00
£98 Cheaper
Motion interpolation frequency is 4.0x faster
3.0x more USB 2.0 port
2.0x more RF port
50% larger HDMI port
Standby power consumption is 33% higher
Moderately heavier weight
A little worse brand
Might not be a LED TV with a teletext function
Newer & Cheaper
LG 47LA740V
82
£598.00
£49 Cheaper
Motion interpolation frequency is 4.0x faster
3.0x more USB 2.0 port
RF port is 2.0x more
HDMI port is 50% larger
33% higher standby power consumption
27% heavier weight
Slightly more expensive to run
Marginally higher typical power consumption
Better User Reviews & Better Score
Sony KDL-47W805
93
£699.00
£53 More Expensive
3.0x more USB 2.0 port
HDMI port is 2.0x larger
2.0x more RF port
2.0x faster motion interpolation frequency
Thickness is 29% thicker
27% heavier weight
Moderately more expensive
A little higher typical power consumption
Better User Reviews & Better Score
Samsung UE40F7000
99
£733.59
£87 More Expensive
Motion interpolation frequency is 4.0x faster
3.0x more RF port
USB 2.0 port is 3.0x more
2.0x larger HDMI port
67% higher standby power consumption
Worse energy efficiency class
High frequency rate is 20% slower
Marginally more expensive
Better Score & Newer
Sony KDL-46W905
96
£720.00
£74 More Expensive
Motion interpolation frequency is 4.0x faster
USB 2.0 port is 3.0x more
HDMI port is 2.0x larger
SCART port is 2.0x larger
Annual energy consumption is 2.3x higher
32% heavier weight
Thickness is 23% thicker
Marginally more expensive
Lower Running Costs & Better User Reviews
Samsung UE40F6500
97
£532.55
£115 Cheaper
3.0x more USB 2.0 port
2.0x bigger component video in port
2.0x larger HDMI port
2.0x faster motion interpolation frequency
Thickness is 11x thicker
Marginally older
Display diagonal is 13% smaller