Forgotten your password?

Samsung UE46F6100

86

“A Very Highly Rated LED TV”

£108.6446"Full HDA+
RUNNING COST OVER 5 YEARSDISPLAY DIAGONALHD TYPEENERGY EFFICIENCY CLASS

When we compared the Samsung UE46F6100 to other mid-size TVs that are one year old, overall we thought it was a really very good LED TV. It has very good user reviews and has better than average technical qualities. We noted that the UE46F6100 is one of the most expensive mid-size TVs.

Customers thought that this mid-size TV was good for watching TV and films in 3D. They also said that this mid-size TV had a superior high def picture. Furthemore, reviewers said that this Samsung LED TV produced a high quality picture, that it had a good design and that it was priced fairly. However, it is worth noting though that because this Samsung LED TV is over a year old it might not have some of the more recent technology found on the most recently released LED TVs. Additionally, most customers reckoned that this mid-size TV was poor quality, that it was bad at displaying standard definition TV and that it did not have a good stand.

Get Free Price Drop Alerts  Price Alert On

Email me FREE price alerts for the Samsung UE46F6100

Your email is always kept private.

You must provide an email address

Email me FREE price alerts for the Samsung UE46F6100

£

Please enter a price.

Email me FREE price alerts for the Samsung UE46F6100

Please provide a firstname

Change price alert    Cancel price alert  
We will send you price updates and vouchers for this product by email. We will email you vouchers and price alerts for this product when the price drops below £403.99. Please check your inbox and spam folder and click the link in the confirmation email that we have sent to you in order to start receiving price alerts.
Samsung UE46F6100

Best Samsung UE46F6100 Prices

eBay logo
£403.99
Free delivery
Shipping to: GB
Misco UK logo
£646.99
Delivery: £8.48
In stock
Amazon logo
£699.52
11 Reasons For
Samsung LED TVs Have Good Reviews
We checked 7,306 expert and user reviews for Samsung LED TVs and found that on average Samsung has good reviews compared to other manufacturers. However we also found that Samsung has good reviews specifically within its mid-size TVs range.
91.3
88.9
88.1
87.7
LG
87.4
86.4
85.8
84.4
82.3
81
Reasonably Priced
Three customers thought the Samsung UE46F6100 had a reasonable price.

Three Samsung UE46F6100 reviewers wrote in their reviews that this LED TVs was good value for money. Tom Hall wrote in their review "I'm still amazed it cost me £379". Mr. J. R. Rodgers "josephsco23" wrote in their review of the Samsung UE46F6100 this month "Good picture and price" and gave the Samsung UE46F6100 a rating of 5 stars.

Good Picture Quality
Six out of ten Samsung UE46F6100 owners thought the Samsung UE46F6100 had a good picture quality.

Three Samsung UE46F6100 owners who reviewed the product considered that it had good picture quality. K said in their review on Amazon this year "Great picture no hassle set up" and gave the Samsung UE46F6100 a score of 5 stars. In September this year Mr. John C. Slater "john Slater" wrote in their review of this LED TVs on Amazon "Great picture, easy to use" and gave the Samsung UE46F6100 a rating of 5 stars. A few weeks ago Mr. J. R. Rodgers "josephsco23" mentioned in their review of the Samsung UE46F6100 on Amazon "Good picture and price" and gave it a score of 5 stars.

3D Picture Quality is Good
One Samsung UE46F6100 owner thought the Samsung UE46F6100 had a good 3D picture quality.

One Samsung UE46F6100 owner agreed that it had a good 3D picture quality. Craig said on Amazon "Fantastic 3D tv!" in their review.

Good High Def TV
One Samsung UE46F6100 owner thought the Samsung UE46F6100 had a great high def picture.

One Samsung UE46F6100 owner agreed that the Samsung UE46F6100 was good at displaying high definition TV. Mr. Robert King gave this LED TVs a rating of 99 out of 100 and mentioned in their Samsung UE46F6100 review "HD very good, seeing films its quite a change".

Nice Design
One Samsung UE46F6100 owner thought the Samsung UE46F6100 had a good design.

One Samsung UE46F6100 owner wrote in their reviews that the Samsung UE46F6100 was good looking. Happyshopper gave the product a rating of 5 stars and wrote in their review "Gorgeous".

90
Excellent Owner Reviews
The average owner rating of this LED TV is 90% based on 43 owner reviews. Read user reviews.
Excellent (74%)
Good (14%)
Average (5%)
Poor (2%)
Terrible (5%)
Full HD
The UE46F6100 has the most common HD type of LED TVs that are currently available, which is Full HD. Full HD TVs have a resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels.

It is worth also looking at other Full HD LED TVs including the KDL-42W654, or the KDL-46R473 from Sony or the LG 47LA740V all of which are cheaper; or the TX-L42E6, the TX-L47ET60, or the TX-L42DT65 all from Panasonic all of which have a better Kagoo Rating™.
No. of LED TVs
0
1500
3000
HD-Ready
Full HD
4K Ultra HD
8K Ultra HD
Worst
Best
HD Type
Supports 3D Content
Unlike most of the one year old mid-size TVs the UE46F6100 support 3D content.

We compared this LED TV to all the other LED TVs which support 3D content and we think the LG 47LA740V which is cheaper; or the Samsung UE46F6670, the Panasonic TX-L42DT65, and the LG 42LA740V which have a better Kagoo Rating™ are also worth considering.
0
1688
Are LED TVs Which Support 3D Content
0
3136
Are LED TVs Which Do Not Support 3D Content
Number of LED TVs which support 3D content
High RMS Rated Power
The lowest RMS rated power of mid-size TVs that have been around for more than a year is 6W and the highest is 40W. With a RMS rated power of 20W, the UE46F6100 has one of the higher RMS rated powers of mid-size TVs of this age.
No. of LED TVs
0
1150
2300
20W
2W
6.7W
11W
16W
21W
25W
30W
35W
39W
44W
120W
Worst
Best
RMS Rated Power
Fast Motion Interpolation Frequency
At 200Hz motion interpolation frequency, the UE46F6100 has a fairly fast motion interpolation frequency compared to most of the other other mid-size TVs that were released around the same time. One year old mid-size TVs have a motion interpolation frequency between 50Hz and 1400Hz.
No. of LED TVs
0
550
1100
200
Hz
50
160
260
370
470
580
680
790
890
1000
2000
Worst
Best
Motion Interpolation Frequency (Hz)
9 Reasons Against
Inferior Standard Def TV
One purchaser thought the Samsung UE46F6100 was bad at displaying standard definition TV.

One Samsung UE46F6100 owner said in their reviews that this LED TVs was not good at displaying standard definition TV. Mark Tanner wrote in September this year "Terrible in sd" in their review of the Samsung UE46F6100.

Inferior Stand
One Samsung UE46F6100 owner thought the Samsung UE46F6100 had a bad stand.

One Samsung UE46F6100 reviewer wrote that this LED TVs did not have a good stand. Mr. Na Etheridge gave it a rating of 80 out of 100 and said on Amazon "Nightmare stand assembly" in their Samsung UE46F6100 review.

Poor Product Quality
Two Samsung UE46F6100 owners thought the Samsung UE46F6100 was of a poor quality.

Two people said in their reviews that it was not good quality. Western Critic wrote in their Samsung UE46F6100 review "Disappointing picture quality".

One of the Most Expensive Mid-size TVs
At £646.99 this LED TV looks expensive for a mid-size TV that has been around for more than a year. The cheapeast mid-size TVs that have been on the market for more than a year that we found costs £79 and the most expensive costs £4,065.
Slow High Frequency Rate
Within all the mid-size TVs that are more than a year old the high frequency rates range from 50Hz to 1600Hz, and the average high frequency rate is 176Hz. The UE46F6100 has a fairly slow high frequency rate (only 200Hz) compared to most of the other other mid-size TVs that were released around the same time.
No. of LED TVs
0
600
1200
200
Hz
50
150
250
350
450
540
640
740
840
940
3000
Best
Worst
High Frequency Rate (Hz)
Only Two HDMI Ports
The UE46F6100 is a two HDMI port LED TV.
No. of LED TVs
0
750
1500
2
1 2 3 4 5 6
Worst
Best
No. of HDMI Ports
Only One USB 2.0 Port
The UE46F6100 is a one USB 2.0 port LED TV.
No. of LED TVs
0
1100
2200
1
1 2 3 4 - 10
Worst
Best
No. of USB 2.0 Ports
High Annual Energy Consumption
Other mid-size TVs that have been on the market for around the same time have an annual energy consumption between 0.22kWh and 139.5kWh. The UE46F6100 is a 91kWh annual energy consumption LED TV which means that has one of the higher annual energy consumption of mid-size TVs of this age.
No. of LED TVs
0
315
630
91
kWh
0.22
19
38
57
76
95
110
130
150
170
660
Best
Worst
Annual Energy Consumption (kWh)
Only One RF Port
The UE46F6100 is a one RF port LED TV.
No. of LED TVs
0
1050
2100
1
1 2 3
Worst
Best
No. of RF Ports
4 Other Reasons to Consider the Samsung UE46F6100
Video Review
Samsung UE46F6100 3D TV Teil 2 Fernseher Shutter Review Test Unboxing Blu-ray Full HD.
19 Months Old
It was 19 months ago when this Samsung LED TV was released.
Price Has Increased by £0.15
In the last 55 days the UE46F6100 has increased in price by £0.15.
OK Running Costs
The energy efficiency classification of this mid-size TV is A+, and the average 5 year running cost of the UE46F6100 is £111 based on typical usage levels and energy prices, which is typical compared to the other 181 mid-size TVs that have been around for more than a year.
Calculate your own running costs for the Samsung UE46F6100.
No. of LED TVs
0
500
1000
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
A+
A++
A+++
Worst
Best
Energy Efficiency Class
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Similar LED TVs Worth Considering

Better User Reviews & Better Score
Samsung UE46F8000
99
£1,299.00
£896 More Expensive
5.0x faster motion interpolation frequency
3.0x more RF port
3.0x more USB 2.0 port
HDMI port is 2.0x more
Less than twice the price
Typical power consumption is 15% higher
Annual energy consumption is 14% higher
A bit worse energy efficiency class
Lower Running Costs & Better Score
LG 42LA740V
91
£599.99
£196 More Expensive
4.0x faster motion interpolation frequency
3.0x more USB 2.0 port
2.0x more RF port
50% more HDMI port
33% higher standby power consumption
Worse expert reviews
A bit heavier weight
Marginally worse brand
Lower Running Costs & Better User Reviews
Samsung UE40F7000
99
£988.00
£585 More Expensive
Motion interpolation frequency is 4.0x faster
3.0x more USB 2.0 port
RF port is 3.0x more
HDMI port is 2.0x more
Worse energy efficiency class
More expensive
High frequency rate is 20% slower
Display diagonal is 13% smaller
Newer & Cheaper
LG 47LA740V
85
£549.99
£146 More Expensive
4.0x faster motion interpolation frequency
USB 2.0 port is 3.0x more
RF port is 2.0x more
HDMI port is 50% more
Standby power consumption is 33% higher
27% heavier weight
Worse expert reviews
Moderately more expensive to run
Cheaper
Samsung UE40D7080
80
£489.59
£86 More Expensive
Motion interpolation frequency is 4.0x faster
3.0x more USB 2.0 port
2.0x more HDMI port
2.0x more RF port
Worse energy efficiency class
More than 3 months older
Slightly worse Kagoo Rating™
Display diagonal is 13% smaller
Cheaper & Newer
Samsung UE46C6530
82
£79.79
£325 Cheaper
Vastly cheaper
2.0x more USB 2.0 port
2.0x faster motion interpolation frequency
HDMI port is 2.0x more
Weight is 40% heavier
Slightly worse Kagoo Rating™
Might not be an LED TV with a WiFi connection
Might not be an LED TV with a common interface plus