« TVs

Samsung UE46F6100

Kagoo Rating™
Price History
Running Costs
Images & Videos
Details
Reviews
81

“A Competent LED Screen”

£108.64A+
Running Cost Over 5 YearsEnergy efficiency class
Samsung UE46F6100

 You have been successfully unsubscribed from price alerts for this product.

Subscribe to free price drop alerts and get notified by email as soon as the price changes.

You are subscribed to receive price alerts for the Samsung UE46F6100.
We will send an email to as soon as the price changes.
Unsubscribe

Offers from retailers in the United Kingdom

eBay logo
Amazon UK logo
Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days

When we compared the age, price and features of the Samsung UE46F6100 to other LED televisions of this age and spec, we reckoned that it was not bad. It has a superior spec compared to similar TVs and has good user reviews.

This 46 inches TV is 3D compatible and is Full HD. In addition, customers were of the view that this LED television had a good picture quality, that it had a good design and that it had a good price. In addition, most owners agreed that this LED television had a good 3D picture quality and that it had a great high def picture. However, owners were of the opinion that this LED television was bad at displaying standard definition TV, that it was inferior quality and that it did not have a good stand. In addition, at nearly two years old, it may not have some of the latest features found on TVs that were released more recently.

Last updated 1 May 2015

18 Reasons For

Samsung Has Excellent Reviews for Its TVs

Samsung is one of the leading LED display brands according to average reviews from owners and experts, and Samsung also has excellent ratings for its mid-size TVs.

Chart

Reasonably Priced

Three customers thought the Samsung UE46F6100 had a reasonable price.

Three Samsung UE46F6100 reviewers wrote in their reviews that this LED TVs was good value for money. Tom Hall wrote in their review "I'm still amazed it cost me £379". Mr. J. R. Rodgers "josephsco23" wrote in their review of the Samsung UE46F6100 this month "Good picture and price" and gave the Samsung UE46F6100 a rating of 5 stars.

Good Picture Quality

Six out of ten Samsung UE46F6100 owners thought the Samsung UE46F6100 had a good picture quality.

Three Samsung UE46F6100 owners who reviewed the product considered that it had good picture quality. K said in their review on Amazon this year "Great picture no hassle set up" and gave the Samsung UE46F6100 a score of 5 stars. In September this year Mr. John C. Slater "john Slater" wrote in their review of this LED TVs on Amazon "Great picture, easy to use" and gave the Samsung UE46F6100 a rating of 5 stars. A few weeks ago Mr. J. R. Rodgers "josephsco23" mentioned in their review of the Samsung UE46F6100 on Amazon "Good picture and price" and gave it a score of 5 stars.

Full HD HD Type

Full HD HD Type

The display resolution of the this LED display is Full HD, which is the most commonly found HD type on LED televisions of a similar spec and age to it. Full HD TVs have a resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels.

Other Full HD LED televisions that you might want to consider include a better rated LED television such as the Samsung UE40H6470 (£428.74).

Read more Less

No. of TVs
0
500
1000
HD-Ready
Full HD
4K Ultra HD
HD Type
84

Good User Reviews

Based on 49 user reviews this LED screen has an average user rating of 84%.

Read user reviews.

Excellent (80%)
Good (6%)
Average (6%)
Poor (8%)
Terrible (0%)

Quality of 3D Pictures is Good

One Samsung UE46F6100 owner thought the Samsung UE46F6100 had a good 3D picture quality.

One Samsung UE46F6100 owner agreed that it had a good 3D picture quality. Craig said on Amazon "Fantastic 3D tv!" in their review.

Good High Def TV

One Samsung UE46F6100 owner thought the Samsung UE46F6100 had a great high def picture.

One Samsung UE46F6100 owner agreed that the Samsung UE46F6100 was good at displaying high definition TV. Mr. Robert King gave this LED TVs a rating of 99 out of 100 and mentioned in their Samsung UE46F6100 review "HD very good, seeing films its quite a change".

Nice Design

One Samsung UE46F6100 owner thought the Samsung UE46F6100 had a good design.

One Samsung UE46F6100 owner wrote in their reviews that the Samsung UE46F6100 was good looking. Happyshopper gave the product a rating of 5 stars and wrote in their review "Gorgeous".

Big Screen Size

TVs that are one year old have screen sizes of between 31" and 50", and the average screen size is 40". The UE46F6100 has one of the bigger screen sizes (46 inches) amongst TVs of this age.

We compared this TV to all the other 46" LED screens and we think the Samsung UE46EH5300 which have a better Kagoo Rating™ are also worth considering.

TVs with a bigger screen size that might be worth also looking at include the TX-47AS740 (£499.00) (47" and higher rated), or the TX-47AS650 (£449.00) (47" and higher rated) both from Panasonic.

Read more Less

No. of TVs
0
220
440
46"
7"
16"
23"
30"
37"
44"
50"
57"
64"
71"
98"
Worst
Best
Screen Size

3D Compatible

Most of the other mid-size TVs that have been on the market for around the same time as the UE46F6100 are not 3D compatible, however the Samsung UE46F6100 is 3D compatible.

Alternative 3D compatible TVs that you might want to consider include a better rated product such as the Sony KDL-40HX753.

Read more Less

Smart TV

Unlike most of the other mid-size TVs that have been on the market for more than a year the Samsung UE46F6100 is Smart TV.

It is worth considering alternative Smart TV LED screens including a higher scoring product such as the Samsung UE46EH5300.

Read more Less

Fast Refresh Rate

Comparable spec LED televisions that have been available for more than a year have refresh rates of between 50Hz and 1,600Hz, and the average refresh rate is 170Hz. At 200 hertz, the UE46F6100 has a quite fast refresh rate compared to most of the other one year old similar spec TVs.

We think you might also be interested in different 200Hz refresh rate TVs including a higher rated product such as the Sony KDL-40HX753.

If this TV refresh rate is not fast enough for you then you might want to consider the UE40H6600 (£455.13) (400Hz and higher rated), or the UE40H6500 (£388.00) (400Hz and higher rated) both from Samsung.

Read more Less Chart

1920 X 1080 Pixels Display Resolution

This LED display has a display resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, which is the most commonly found display resolution on comparable spec TVs that are older than a year.

Read more Less Chart

Features Two Dolby Technologies

The number of Dolby technologies featured on the UE46F6100 is more than most one year old comparable spec LED displays. The most commonly featured Dolby technology is Digital Plus, but this Dolby technology is not featured on this LED television. The Dolby technologies Dolby Digital Plus and Dolby Digital Pulse are also featured on this TV.

Chart

High RMS Rated Power

The average RMS rated power of mid-size TVs that were launched around the same time as the UE46F6100 is 18W. With a RMS rated power of 20 Watts, the UE46F6100 has a fairly high RMS rated power compared to most of the other mid-size TVs that were released around the same time as the UE46F6100.

Read more Less Chart

Has Four Smart Modes

The number of smart modes found on the UE46F6100 is more than most LED displays of a comparable age and spec to it. This LED screen has a game smart mode, which is the most frequently found smart mode found on one year old mid-size TVs. The smart modes "Movie", "Natural" and "Sports" are also found on this Samsung LED display.

Chart

Supports One Video

The UE46F6100 has a greater number of video modes than most TVs of a similar spec and age to it. This LED television supports a 1080p video, which is the most commonly supported video supported by similar spec TVs that are older than a year.

Chart

Has One Screen Format Adjustment

The Samsung UE46F6100 has a greater number of screen format adjustments than most mid-size TVs that have been on the market for around the same time as it. This LED display has a 16:9 screen format adjustment, which is the most commonly found screen format adjustment found on LED televisions that were launched more than a year ago.

Chart

7 Reasons Against

Inferior Standard Def TV

One purchaser thought the Samsung UE46F6100 was bad at displaying standard definition TV.

One Samsung UE46F6100 owner said in their reviews that this LED TVs was not good at displaying standard definition TV. Mark Tanner wrote in September this year "Terrible in sd" in their review of the Samsung UE46F6100.

Inferior Stand

One Samsung UE46F6100 owner thought the Samsung UE46F6100 had a bad stand.

One Samsung UE46F6100 reviewer wrote that this LED TVs did not have a good stand. Mr. Na Etheridge gave it a rating of 80 out of 100 and said on Amazon "Nightmare stand assembly" in their Samsung UE46F6100 review.

Poor Product Quality

Two Samsung UE46F6100 owners thought the Samsung UE46F6100 was of a poor quality.

Two people said in their reviews that it was not good quality. Western Critic wrote in their Samsung UE46F6100 review "Disappointing picture quality".

Does Not Have a WiFi Connection

The UE46F6100 does not have a WiFi connection, although it is worth keeping in mind that most of the other comparable spec LED screens that are a similar age to the UE46F6100 also do not have a WiFi connection.

Different LED televisions with a WiFi connection that you might want to consider include the Samsung UE40H6600 (£455.13).

Read more Less

Does Not Have a Built-in Camera

Like most of the other mid-size TVs that are one year old, the UE46F6100 does not have a built-in camera.

There are a number of different TVs with a built-in camera that you might want to consider including the Sony KDL-32W654 (£349.99).

Read more Less

High Annual Energy Consumption

With an annual energy consumption of 91 kilowatt hours, the UE46F6100 has one of the higher annual energy consumptions amongst mid-size TVs of this age. The average annual energy consumption of TVs of this age and type is 68kWh, and the annual energy consumptions range from 23kWh to 230kWh.

Read more Less Chart

Only 2D/3D Comb Filter

The UE46F6100 has a 2D/3D comb filter which is better than the 3D comb filter found on most TVs of this spec and age. The best comb filter of all one year old TVs is 3D and the worst is Digital.

Chart

4 Other Reasons to Consider the Samsung UE46F6100

Over a Year Old

Samsung released the UE46F6100 over a year ago.

OK Running Costs

This mid-size TV is rated A+ for energy efficiency. The UE46F6100 is typical compared to the other 331 mid-size TVs that are one year old that we have assessed for running costs. Based on average energy prices and usage levels, we estimate the UE46F6100 will cost £111 over 5 years to run.


Calculate your own running costs for the Samsung UE46F6100.

No. of TVs
0
300
600
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
A+
A++
A+++
Energy Efficiency Class

Flat Screen Shape

The screen shape of the this TV is Flat, which is typical of many LED televisions of a similar age and spec to it.

Read more Less Chart

  • User Reviews (49)
  • Video Reviews (3)

Similar TVs Worth Considering

Better User Reviews & Better Score
Samsung UE46F8000
94
£1,206.10
£731 More
5.0x faster motion interpolation frequency
3.0x more RF port
3.0x more USB 2.0 port
HDMI port is 2.0x more
2.0x higher RMS rated power
Less than twice the price
Typical power consumption is 15% higher
Annual energy consumption is 14% higher
A bit worse energy efficiency class
More expensive to run
Lower Running Costs & Better User Reviews
Samsung UE40F7000
94
£988.00
£513 More
Motion interpolation frequency is 4.0x faster
3.0x more USB 2.0 port
RF port is 3.0x more
HDMI port is 2.0x more
Better Kagoo Rating™
Worse energy efficiency class
More expensive
High frequency rate is 20% slower
Display diagonal is 13% smaller
Cheaper
Motion interpolation frequency is 4.0x faster
3.0x more USB 2.0 port
2.0x more HDMI port
2.0x more RF port
2.0x larger SCART port
Worse energy efficiency class
More than 3 months older
Slightly worse Kagoo Rating™
Display diagonal is 13% smaller
Might not be an LED TV with a common interface plus
Cheaper & Newer
Vastly cheaper
2.0x more USB 2.0 port
2.0x faster motion interpolation frequency
HDMI port is 2.0x more
More than 4 months newer
Weight is 40% heavier
Slightly worse Kagoo Rating™
Might not be an LED TV with a WiFi connection
Might not be an LED TV with a common interface plus
Might not be an LED TV which supports 3D content