« PC Monitors

Samsung T22C300

Kagoo Rating™
Price History
Running Costs
Images & Videos
Details
Reviews
69

“A Below Average PC Monitor”

£38.72Full HD
Running Cost Over 5 YearsHD type
Samsung T22C300

 You have been successfully unsubscribed from price alerts for this product.

Subscribe to free price drop alerts and get notified by email as soon as the price changes.

You are subscribed to receive price alerts for the Samsung T22C300.
We will send an email to as soon as the price changes.
Unsubscribe

Offers from retailers in the United Kingdom

Amazon UK logo

If the Samsung T22C300 is compared to other PC screens of a comparable age and type, overall it seems to be unremarkable. We researched this flatpanel monitor and noted that it has not received any reviews that we could find.

This PC monitor has a display resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and has a screen size of 21.5 inches. However, it is worth bearing in mind that because this LCD screen is over two years old it might not have some of the newest technology found on the most recently released LCD screens.

Last updated 24 Apr 2015

11 Reasons For

LED Display Type

This PC display has an LED display type, which is the most frequently found display type on small screen size LCD screens that were launched more than two years ago.

We compared this PC display to all the other LCD screens that have an LED Display and we think a higher rated flatpanel monitor such as the Philips 221TE5LB (£139.99), the Samsung LT19B300, and the HP ProDisplay P201 (£85.60) are also worth considering.

Read more Less Chart

1920 X 1080 Pixels Display Resolution

This PC monitor has a display resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, which is the most commonly found display resolution on small screen size LCD screens that have been available for more than two years.

We compared this PC display to all the other PC screens that have a display resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and we think a better rated flatpanel monitor such as the DELL P2212H (£178.80), and the Samsung S22C300 (£111.94) are also worth considering.

Chart

29 OSD Languages

The T22C300 has more OSD languages than most of the LCD screens that have been around for around the same time as the T22C300. This PC display is a twenty-nine OSD language PC screen compared to most of the comparable spec LCD screens that are a similar age to the T22C300 which only have between 3 and 28 OSD languages.

Chart

High RMS Rated Power

At 5 Watts, the Samsung T22C300 has a quite high RMS rated power compared to most of the other small screen size LCD screens that came out more than two years ago. Across all the small screen size LCD screens that have been available for around the same time as the T22C300 the RMS rated power range from 1W to 10W.

Chart

1920 X 1080 (HD 1080) Graphics Resolution

This PC screen has a graphics resolution of 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080), which is the most commonly found graphics resolution on PC screens of this age and type.

Read more Less Chart

Full HD HD Type

This LCD screen has a Full HD HD type, which is the most commonly found HD type on PC monitors of a similar age and type to it.

Chart

16:9 Aspect Ratio

This LCD screen has a 16:9 aspect ratio, which is typical of many LCD screens that are older than two years.

3:4
1:1
5:4
4:3
14:9
16:10
15:9
16:9
17:9
21:9
17:6
16:4
Number of PC monitors with each aspect ratio

Big Display Diagonal

Across all the small screen size LCD screens that are a comparable age to the T22C300 the screen sizes range from 8.9cm to 550cm, and the average display diagonal is 53cm. At 54.61 centimeters, the T22C300 has a quite big display diagonal compared to most of the other PC monitors of a similar age and spec to the T22C300.

Chart

Wide Width With Stand

At 509.7 millimeters, the Samsung T22C300 has a fairly wide width with stand compared to most of the other PC displays of this spec and age. Across all the PC monitors of a similar age and type to the T22C300 the widths with stand range from 250mm to 560mm, and the average width with stand is 460mm.

Chart

Fairly Wide

The narrowest LCD screen of a comparable spec and age to the T22C300 is 16mm wide, the widest is 570mm, and the average width is 450mm. The T22C300 is one of the wider small screen size LCD screens that are more than two years old (509.7 millimeters) amongst small screen size LCD screens of this age.

Chart

Very Shallow

At only 47 millimeters, the Samsung T22C300 is fairly shallow compared to most of the other flatpanel monitors of a similar spec and age to the T22C300. The depths of comparable spec PC screens that are more than two years old range from 12mm to 410mm.

Chart

4 Reasons Against

Price Increase of £20.47

The T22C300 has increased in price by £20.47 in the last few weeks.

Chart

Does Not Have a Built-in Camera

Like most of the other PC monitors of this type and age, the T22C300 does not have a built-in camera.

Read more Less

Not 3D Compatible

The T22C300 is not 3D compatible, although it is worth keeping in mind that most of the other small screen size LCD screens that are more than two years old are also not 3D compatible.

If you are looking for a flatpanel monitor that is 3D compatible then you might want to consider the HP LP2065 (£864.00).

Read more Less

Only One USB 2.0 Port

Most comparable spec flatpanel monitors that are more than two years old have between one and five USB 2.0 ports, including the T22C300 which has one USB 2.0 port.

Chart

5 Other Reasons to Consider the Samsung T22C300

Average Running Costs

The energy efficiency classification of this PC display is B, and the average 5 year running cost of the T22C300 is £41 based on average energy prices and usage levels, which is typical compared to the other 203 LCD screens of a comparable type and age.


Calculate your own running costs for the Samsung T22C300.

No. of PCMonitors
0
20
40
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
A+
A++
A+++
Energy Efficiency Class

OK Brand

Samsung small screen size LCD screens have ok reviews on average and across all PC displays Samsung is one of the ok brands.

92.7
92.4
91.7
88
87.7
NEC
86.5
86.2
85.8
84.8
AOC
84.7
83.5
LG
83.1
83
82.9
82
81.2
80.1
HP
71.6
65.7

Over Two Years Old

This PC screen was released over two years ago.

One Built-in Speaker

The T22C300 is a one built-in speaker flatpanel monitor. That's average compared to the other 106 small screen size LCD screens that were launched around the same time as the T22C300 that we have assessed the number of built-in speakers of.

We think you might also be interested in other 1 built-in speaker flatpanel monitors including the Philips 221TE5LB (£139.99), or the Neovo U-19 (£152.37) which have a better Kagoo Rating™; or the Samsung NC191 (£115.39) which are cheaper.

Read more Less

  • Video Reviews (3)

Similar PC Monitors Worth Considering

Better Score & Newer
DELL P2214H
99
£85.00
£84 Cheaper
USB 2.0 port is 4.0x a bigger number of
Height with stand is 52% bigger
More than 3 months newer
Cheaper
Vertical viewing angle is 11% bigger
3.5x bigger depth with stand
Response time is 60% slower
Package weight is 41% heavier
Typical power consumption is 18% higher
Moderately more expensive to run
Cheaper & Lower Running Costs
Acer G226
87
£71.70
£97 Cheaper
HDMI port is 2.0x a bigger number of
Greatly cheaper
15% bigger height with stand
Better Kagoo Rating™
Vertical viewing angle is 11% bigger
Depth with stand is 3.3x bigger
Slightly smaller height
Better Score & Newer
Benq GW2265
83
£83.73
£85 Cheaper
Better typical contrast ratio
Cheaper
More than 1 month newer
Better Kagoo Rating™
11% bigger vertical viewing angle
36% higher typical power consumption
20% slower response time
More expensive to run
Better Score & Lower Running Costs
Viewsonic VX2252mh
94
£98.77
£70 Cheaper
More than 3 months newer
26% bigger height with stand
Better Kagoo Rating™
Cheaper to run
A bit cheaper
Depth with stand is 4.3x bigger
Marginally bigger packaging height
Height is 17% smaller
Better Score & Newer
Benq VW2235
82
£99.99
£69 Cheaper
Better typical contrast ratio
Cheaper
More than 2 months newer
Vertical viewing angle is 11% bigger
Better Kagoo Rating™
27% higher typical power consumption
Response time is 20% slower
More expensive to run
Might not be a PC monitor with a built-in speaker
Might not be a wall mountable PC monitor
Lower Running Costs & Better Score
Vastly cheaper to run
Has 3 awards
Better Kagoo Rating™
More than 2 months newer
Moderately better brand
Response time is 2.2x slower
Worse typical contrast ratio
Worse HD type
Worse display resolution
Worse display type