« TVs

Cello C32224

Kagoo Rating™
Price History
Running Costs
Images & Videos
Details
Reviews
79

“An Average LED Screen”

£49.06A
Running Cost Over 5 YearsEnergy efficiency class
Cello C32224

 You have been successfully unsubscribed from price alerts for this product.

Subscribe to free price drop alerts and get notified by email as soon as the price changes.

You are subscribed to receive price alerts for the Cello C32224.
We will send an email to as soon as the price changes.
Unsubscribe

Offers from retailers in the United Kingdom

Sonic Direct logo
In stock
£299.00 Save £100.00 (34%)
Delivery: £6.99
RapidWarehouse-Office logo
RapidWarehouse-Office logo
- Less from RapidWarehouse-Office
Office Monster Online logo
Office Monster Online logo
- Less from Office Monster Online

Compared to other LED televisions of a comparable age and spec the Cello C32224 is ok. Having said this, we did note that it has poor user reviews and has an inferior spec in some areas compared to similar LED displays.

This 32 inches TV has a refresh rate of 60 hertz and is HD-ready. However, it's Kagoo Rating™ has been reduced because it is nearly two years old it may not have as many features as TVs that were released more recently.

Last updated 22 May 2015

6 Reasons For

5000:1 Typical Contrast Ratio

The highest typical contrast ratio of the Cello C32224 is 5000:1. That's over five times the typical contrast ratio of a 1000:1 LED screen, which is the most frequently found typical contrast ratio.

A 5000:1 typical contrast ratio is actually the best typical contrast ratio across all LED displays of this age and spec.

Across comparable types of LED television the worst typical contrast ratio is 500:1.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Supports Two Analog Signal Format Systems

The Cello C32224 has a greater number of analog signal format systems than most LED displays that are one year old. This Cello LED display supports a PAL analog signal format system, which is the most frequently supported analog signal format system supported by small screen size LED screens that came out around the same time as the C32224. The analog signal format system "SECAM" is also supported by this LED screen.

Chart Edit

Supports Three TV Bands

The number of TV bands supported by the Cello C32224 is more than most small screen size LED screens that are more than a year old. This LED screen supports a VHF TV band, which is the most frequently supported TV band supported by small screen size LED screens that came out more than a year ago. The TV bands "CATV" and "UHF" are also supported by this LED display.

Chart Edit

Three HDMI Ports

Three HDMI Ports

The Cello C32224 is a three HDMI port LED display. Most of the other small screen size LED screens that were released more than a year ago have between one and three HDMI ports.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Has One Screen Format Adjustment

The number of screen format adjustments found on the Cello C32224 is more than most TVs of this age and spec. This LED screen has a 16:9 screen format adjustment, which is the most commonly found screen format adjustment found on comparable spec LED screens that have been available for more than a year.

Chart Edit

DVD Player Optical Disc Drive

This LED screen has a DVD player optical disc drive, which is the most commonly found optical disc drive on one year old small screen size LED screens.

Read more Less Chart Edit

5 Reasons Against

Not Smart TV

Most of the small screen size LED screens that are one year old are not Smart TV, including the Cello C32224.

Edit

Does Not Have a WiFi Connection

Most of the small screen size LED screens that have been on the market for a similar time to the C32224, including the Cello C32224, do not have a WiFi connection.

There are a number of other LED displays with a WiFi connection that you might want to consider including the Sony KDL-32R433 (£170.00), the LG 27MT55 (£199.99), or the Panasonic TX-39AS500 (£190.00).

Read more Less Edit

Not 3D Compatible

Like most of the other LED screens of this spec and age, the Cello C32224 is not 3D compatible.

If you are looking for an LED screen that is 3D compatible then you might want to also look at the C22EFF (£193.14), or the C32227 (£155.00) both from Cello or the Toshiba 32W3455 (£229.99).

Read more Less Edit

Does Not Have a Built-in Camera

Like most of the other small screen size LED screens that are older than a year, the Cello C32224 does not have a built-in camera.

Edit

Quite Thick

The Cello C32224 is one of the thicker LED displays that have been on the market for around the same time as the C32224 (90 millimeters) amongst similar spec TVs of this age. The average thickness of small screen size LED screens that were launched around the same time as the C32224 is 65mm.

Read more Less Chart Edit

5 Other Reasons to Consider the Cello C32224

Running Costs Are Average

This Cello TV has an energy efficiency rating of A, and the C32224 is typical compared to the other 194 TVs of a comparable type and age that we have analysed for running costs. Based on typical usage levels and energy prices, we estimate the C32224 will cost £53 over 5 years to run.


Calculate your own running costs for the Cello C32224.

Edit

No. of TVs
0
300
600
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
A+
A++
A+++
Energy Efficiency Class

HD-Ready HD Type

HD-Ready HD Type

The display resolution of the this LED television is HD-ready, which is typical of many small screen size LED screens that have been available for a comparable time to it. HD-ready TVs have a resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels.

We compared all the other HD-ready LED televisions to this TV and we think a higher rated product such as the 32W3455 (£229.99), and the 32W3451 (£169.99) both from Toshiba or the Samsung UE28H4000 (£168.90) are also worth considering.

If the display resolution of this LED display is too bad for you then you might want to also look at the Panasonic TX-39AS500 (£190.00) (Full HD and higher rated); or the Orion CLB22B200 (£151.89) (Full HD and cheaper).

Read more Less Edit

No. of TVs
0
500
1000
2K Ultra HD
HD-Ready
Full HD
Wide Quad HD
4K Ultra HD
HD Type

Over a Year Old

This LED television has been on the market for over a year.

Cello Has OK TV Reviews

Cello small screen size LED screens have ok reviews on average and across all LED televisions Cello is one of the average brands.

Chart

Average Refresh Rate

At 60 hertz, the Cello C32224 has a fairly typical refresh rate compared to most of the other one year old LED screens.

If you would prefer an LED television with a faster refresh rate then you might want to consider the LG 32LB550 (£162.00) (100Hz and higher rated); or the Philips 32PHH4309 (£175.00) (100Hz and cheaper).

Read more Less Edit

No. of TVs
0
250
500
60
Hz
50
180
310
430
560
690
820
940
1.1k
1.2k
3k
Worst
Best
Refresh Rate (Hz)

Cello C32224 Product Identifiers

Manufacturer Part Numbers c32224, c32224f, cello c32224, cello c32224f, cello c32224fp, cello c32224fpw, cello c32227, cello c32227f, cello c32227fp, cello c32227fpw, C32224FQUAD, C32224F, C32224FPW, 77161629/1/C32224F, C32224F QUAD, C32224DVB, c32224d, c32224dv, c32224dvb, c32224fl, c32224fle, c32224fled, false c32224, false c32224f, false c32224fp, false c32224fpw, false c32224fpww, false c32224fpwwh, f
Barcodes 05060062264579
  • User Reviews (3)

Similar TVs Worth Considering

Better User Reviews & Better Score
Toshiba 32L6353
88
£319.95
£121 More
Has 4 awards
Greatly better HD type
USB 2.0 port is 2.0x more
Better user reviews
33% more HDMI port
Greatly worse typical contrast ratio
Typical power consumption is 36% higher
More expensive to run
More than 3 months older
Better User Reviews & Better Score
Samsung UE40F5300
90
£299.00
£100 More
Much better HD type
USB 2.0 port is 2.0x more
2.0x more RF port
Better user reviews
25% bigger display diagonal
Typical power consumption is 2.0x higher
A lot more expensive to run
More than 2 months older
Might not be an LED TV with a PC Audio in port
Might not be an LED TV with a PC in port
Better User Reviews & Better Score
Sharp LC-39LE651
80
£449.00
£250 More
A lot better HD type
RMS rated power is 88% higher
40% brighter display brightness
HDMI port is 33% more
22% bigger display diagonal
High frequency rate is 67% slower
Typical power consumption is 61% higher
A lot more expensive to run
A little more expensive
Might not be an LED TV with a common interface connection
Bigger Display Diagonal & Better Score
3.0x more USB 2.0 port
Much better HD type
RF port is 2.0x more
31% bigger display diagonal
25% higher RMS rated power
86% higher typical power consumption
Much more expensive to run
A little more expensive
Better User Reviews & Better Score
USB 2.0 port is 3.0x more
Much better HD type
2.0x more RF port
50% higher RMS rated power
Better user reviews
43% higher typical power consumption
More expensive to run
More than 4 months older
Slightly more expensive
Might not be an LED TV with a PC in port